Skip navigation.
Home

Don't Invest Like Jon Stewart's Mom

Hey, that was a lot of awkward fun, wasn't it?
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart last night, you'll have to turn to one of a million or so links on the Internet to see the rousing conclusion to "Basic Cable Personality Clash Skirmish '09," a.k.a. the weeklong feud between TheStreet.com 's (Nasdaq: TSCM) Jim Cramer and Comedy Central's Jon Stewart. For those who would rather waste that 22 minutes of their life on Minesweeper or NCAA basketball, here's what we learned."/>
For those of you who missed The Daily Show with Jon Stewart last night, you'll have to turn to one of a million or so links on the Internet to see the rousing conclusion to "Basic Cable Personality Clash Skirmish '09," a.k.a. the weeklong feud between TheStreet.com 's (Nasdaq: TSCM) Jim Cramer and Comedy Central's Jon Stewart. For those who would rather waste that 22 minutes of their life on Minesweeper or NCAA basketball, here's what we learned.

1) Yes, Jim Cramer is a manic clown.
2) Jim Cramer's nephew writes the Mad Money show while wearing his pajamas.
3) CNBC is not good at hard-hitting reporting.
4) Jon Stewart's pretty peeved about all this and ready to drop a few f-bombs to let folks know it.
5) Long-term investing doesn't work.

Wait, what?
As a practitioner of long-term investing here at The Motley Fool, I was pretty shocked by this revelation. But there it was as the interview was wrapping up. Let's go to the transcript:

Jon Stewart: My mother is 75. And she bought into the idea that long-term investing is the way to go. And guess what?

Jim Cramer: It didn't work.

[Jon Stewart assents with some Arthur Fonzarelli-type hand motion and concurrent clicking noise.]

We'll assume that was an assent
Now, I'm not going to pull a Rick Santelli and call Jon Stewart or his mother a loser because that would bring down the wrath of The Daily Show and Dora the Explorer (who my nephews envy, and if they saw her swearing at me in Spanish it would absolutely kill them) upon me. But even if Jon Stewart's mom -- like all of us long-term investors -- has lost a great deal of money over the past 16 or so months, that's not evidence that long-term investing doesn't work.

In fact, long-term investing is the only way to protect yourself from the manipulations, machinations, and generally idiocy that drive stock price movements on a day-to-day basis. And if Jon Stewart's mom truly is/was a long-term investor, then she should have come through this current calamity relatively ok provided she has been a long-term investor for the long-term and had been sticking to a disciplined multi-decade asset-allocation game plan. That means keeping a mix of stocks and bonds, and within that stock allocation having a mix of asset classes. It doesn't mean simply loading up on General Motors (NYSE: GM), Eastman Kodak (NYSE: EK), and Bear Stearns because Jim Cramer told you "Bear Stearns is fine!" -- and only those three stocks -- and throwing up your hands because it doesn't work.

Here's why
Let's assume Jon Stewart's mom started investing 30 years ago, in 1979, at age 45. Let's further the following simple allocation strategy:

  1. She invested simply in the Vanguard 500 Index (Nasdaq: VFINX), a low-cost market-tracker that holds giants today such as ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), General Electric (NYSE: GE), and Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT).
  2. At age 55, she realized that she was nearing retirement and should be increasing her allocation to principal-protecting bonds, using the rule of thumb that her bond allocation should be equal to her age.
  3. Finally, let's assume that she invested the same amount of money, be it $1, $100, $1,000, or $10,000, at the beginning of each and every year.

Where would she be today following a greater than 50% collapse in the stock market?

I realize that's a lot of assumptions
Now, portfolio simulations like this are tricky to pull off and don't account for all the details -- such as, in this example, frictional costs or dividend yields which I'm assuming canceled out -- but they are illuminating. And according to my conservative math, for every $1 that Jon Stewart's mom put in over the trailing 30-year period, she would have $1.63 today. So, if all told, she had deposited $500,000 over the years (in annual $16,667 increments), she would have $815,000 today.

Now, let's be honest, that's not great.

It's not 10% or 20% annual returns, it's not turning thousands into millions, and it's not an enormous stock market success story. But it is certainly enough to live on and evidence of how long-term investing -- provided it's practiced with discipline and an eye toward asset allocation -- can protect your wealth and give you the opportunity to make money.

Because let's be honest, though the stock market is down today, it will rebound. Commerce around the world is too strong for it to be otherwise. And the worst thing Jon Stewart's mom could do today is -- at her son's behest -- give up faith in long-term investing as the market stands at a 10-year bottom.

In sum
Numbers, jokes, and snarky comments aside, what I'm saying is this: Rather than be angry, let's recognize that the stock market, like most human endeavors, is flawed. There will be disasters and blow-ups from time to time, just as there will be bubbles. Let's use this as an opportunity to educate more Americans about how to take control of their finances and ignore the market's manic day-to-day movements.

The solution is not to scare Americans into thinking the stock market is some Ponzi scheme controlled by immoral cretins that can never work for them. See, over time, those cretins are found out. And over time, everyone can make money in the stock market and enjoy a more secure retirement by having a long-term investing timeline and sticking to a disciplined asset allocation plan. That means not abandoning bonds when stocks are outperforming and not abandoning stocks when bonds are outperforming.

Copyright © 2008 Universal Press Syndicate.

( filed under: | | | )
Anonymous's picture

Revisionism

The weeny whiny bitch boys of the American investor class are all MAD at Jon Stewart for being such a meanie to poor Jim Cramer. Except it didn't happen that way, did it? This week Stewart showed, by CNBC's own words and actions, how this media outlet of the investor class systematically and deliberately mislead viewers about the state of the economic industry. Then, on Thursday, he showed Jim Cramer, in his own words, touting a scheme for selling short that is basically criminal stock manipulation.

Stewart didn't SAY this - he SHOWED it. The investor class has maintained CNBC, Bloomberg and FoxBusiness as shills and cheerleaders for for their "industry" for decades, running infomercials for the biggest Ponzi scheme in human history. They are damned by their own words and actions.

Now the author of this piece is mad at Jon Stewart's MOTHER for getting ripped off.

The Cramer clips regarding shorting Apple that Stewart aired are frightening. They show an investor class culture that is entirely amoral, without even the slightest shreds of ethics or integrity, and way out of control. And none of you apologists has the stones to call it what it is.

There is no way any investor class apologist is going to convince ANYONE that this culture of corruption is not systemic to the entire industry. The events of the past year have demonstrated over and over that the investor class are not good citizens, not good neighbors and nobody's friend. The investor class has sold out America's interests for short-term gains.

Post new comment

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recent comments