|
|
||||
![]() |
Thursday Apr 03
|
|||
| |
||||
Why This Stock Is a Winnerby Rex Moore - November 22, 2007 - 0 comments
If you could wave a magic wand and bestow just one characteristic on all of your investments, what would it be? (Besides the ability to print money, that is.) I began thinking about this after reading Tom Gardner's "A 25-Bagger in Five Years," where he identified three things that give a company the chance to achieve outsized gains over the years -- like 25-baggers that turn $5,000 into $125,000. Of the three he mentions (and actively screens for in Motley Fool Hidden Gems), one characteristic is most important to me: a high level of insider ownership.
" title="Why This Stock Is a Winner"/> If you could wave a magic wand and bestow just one characteristic on all of your investments, what would it be? (Besides the ability to print money, that is.) I began thinking about this after reading Tom Gardner's "A 25-Bagger in Five Years," where he identified three things that give a company the chance to achieve outsized gains over the years -- like 25-baggers that turn $5,000 into $125,000. Of the three he mentions (and actively screens for in Motley Fool Hidden Gems), one characteristic is most important to me: a high level of insider ownership. Why it matters Having a wonderful time ... What is the opposite of that? Businesses where management has very little tied up in company stock. Where actions may be motivated by things that actually harm the stock's performance, like office politics, power plays, or working more with an eye on the clock (is it 5:00 yet?) than on improving the business model. Or, even worse, management that rewards itself with high salaries and bonuses that have nothing to do with outstanding performance. Now, don't be chagrined if you find that some of your larger holdings have a low percentage of insider ownership. For example, PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP) is only 0.09% owned by insiders. Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) sports just 0.27% insider ownership. The sheer size of those companies makes it awfully tough for anyone to own a significant share of the entire business. But smaller companies are a much different story. In small-cap land, CEOs and managers with high levels of ownership are much more likely to rise above the mediocrity and work toward the common goal of great stock performance. For instance Company Insider Ownership Sales Growth* EPS Growth* Net Margin* ROE* Morningstar (Nasdaq: MORN) 68% 40% 37% 17% 23% Synchronoss Technologies (Nasdaq: SNCR) 24% 60% 40% 20% 21% Charles Schwab (Nasdaq: SCHW) 20% 34% 41% 54% 26% Ambassadors Group (Nasdaq: EPAX) 21% 28% 26% 29% 36% Asta Funding (Nasdaq: ASFI) 18% 31% 27% 46% 26% And beyond The process is working. Tom and his analysts are averaging 44% total returns for their recommendations versus 15% for identical amounts invested in the S&P 500. We invite you to take a free trial and look through all of our active recommendations. There's no obligation to subscribe. |
|
||||||
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts on themoneytimes.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. TheMoneyTimes advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision. ©2004-2008 All Rights Reserved unless mentioned otherwise. [Submit News/Press Release][Terms of Service] [Privacy Policy] [About us] [Contact us] |