|
|
||||
![]() |
Saturday Dec 15
|
|||
| |
||||
The Worst Mistake You Can Makeby Motley Fool - September 20, 2007 - 0 comments
By Claire Stephanic Fifty-six percent of eligible employees participated in defined contribution plans in 2006, according to a Fidelity Investments survey reported in The Wall Street Journal. That figure is down a bit from the year before, when 56.9% participated. That means nearly half of eligible employees did not participate. Big mistake -- considering that 39% of Americans age 55 and older have less than $25,000 saved for retirement. Unless you're (a) planning on winning the lottery or (b) inheriting millions, snubbing your company's 401(k) plan is the worst mistake you can make for your retirement. So what's a Fool to do? Get in the game That's even more important for today's worker, who faces an uncertain Social Security benefit and an increasingly nonexistent, vanishing, or underfunded traditional pension plan. Free money's not the only reason to fund your 401(k). Even without an employer match, employee contribution plans have tax benefits. Money contributed to an employer plan is not included in your income, and taxes are not due until retirement. Plus, the amount you decide to contribute will be transferred directly from your paycheck to your account, so you won't have to go through the process of parting with your cash every month. I did call ... earlier ... or was it later? Years Results 10 $53,000 20 $189,000 30 $542,000 40 $1.4 million That $1.4 million nest egg assumes no employer match. Include an employer match of 50%, and your retirement account rises to $2.2 million! Obviously, the earlier you start the better. But if, say, you're 40 years old and have a standing start of $0, the time to start is now -- letting that money compound for 25 years will have a huge effect on your retirement nest egg. So how do you go about matching the market's historical return of 10%? Diversify What would a well-diversified portfolio look like? For an aggressive investor -- one who is decades away from retirement -- Robert recommends a model portfolio made up almost entirely of equities, with only a small allocation to bonds. Roughly 50% would be devoted to large-cap blue chips such as Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), and Motorola (NYSE: MOT), which generally come with less volatility and increasing dividends. Small-cap stocks such as Middleby (Nasdaq: MIDD), Zumiez (Nasdaq: ZUMZ), and Jones Soda (Nasdaq: JSDA) are capitalized at less than $2 billion, and although they can be risky, they have a lot of potential. The aggressive portfolio advises a 15% allocation to small caps, with another 10% devoted to stocks headquartered outside the United States. A good play for that portion is the Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund (FUND: VGTSX). It tracks the performance of stocks in Europe, the Pacific region, and emerging-market countries; it's cheap, with no load and a 0.32% expense ratio; and its 10-year annualized return beats the S&P 500's by nearly two percentage points. That's just a starting point -- the allocations will depend on, and change with, your age and years from retirement. The closer you get, the more conservative your portfolio must be (as you switch from building to preserving your nest egg). The two important factors: The Foolish bottom line If you need ideas, tools, model portfolios, or specific stock or fund recommendations, I encourage you to let Robert's Rule Your Retirement service guide you through planning for future expenses, asset allocation, strategies for deferring taxes, and more. © 2007 Universal Press Syndicate. |
|
||||||
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts on themoneytimes.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. TheMoneyTimes advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision. ©2004-2007 All Rights Reserved unless mentioned otherwise. [Submit News/Press Release][Terms of Service] [Privacy Policy] [About us] [Contact us] |