|
|
||||
![]() |
Monday Dec 17
|
|||
| |
||||
Tee to Lots of Greenby Selena Maranjian - September 20, 2007 - 0 comments
Players get points toward the Cup throughout the year; at the end of the year, they're reseeded and some participate in four final tournaments. At the end of the event, a grand prize winner -- based on points -- gets a $10 million bonus provided by FedEx (NYSE: FDX). It didn't surprise me too much when Tiger Woods won the whole thing. But here's where it gets interesting: That $10 million isn't awarded via a big check on the green. And Tiger didn't get a suitcase filled with $50s and $100s. Instead, it's awarded as deferred compensation. As I understand it, Tiger can't collect that money until he's at least 45, but if he plays at least 15 tournaments each year, he can defer getting paid until he's 60. Does this sound familiar? It might, because it sounds an awful lot like a retirement account -- like an IRA or a 401(k) that many of us invest in to provide for our futures. Pros and cons But I can think of some problems with the arrangement: Mainly, it smacks a little of patronization. Instead of trusting the winners to manage their own money, it's putting the cash aside and letting it grow until retirement. (The age of 45 might seem like a rather early retirement to you and me, but it's realistic for many professional golfers.) There's a considerable upside, though. Remember that many of us just aren't good at saving for our futures. That's why employer-sponsored retirement plans have been so effective and why there's a movement afoot to automatically enroll workers in them, to prevent their never getting around to it themselves. I suspect that some golfers aren't so different from us. They may expect to keep doing well for many more years and may not sock moola away for their golden years. They may end up with long dry spells, wishing they'd saved more. For example ... Kind of amazing, eh? Just about $300 million. That should surely be welcome money in 30 years. If you're thinking that because you don't have $10 million to invest, you're out of luck, think again. If you have just one one-hundredth of that -- $100,000 -- you might end up with $3 million. That's still darn handy to live off of. Withdraw a conservative 4% yearly and that's $120,000. You can compete You can match the market's return via a broad-market index fund such as the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (AMEX: VTI). But faring even better over the past decade are managed funds such as the Fidelity Capital Appreciation (FDCAX) fund, which has racked up average annual gains of 17% over the past five years and is invested in companies such as Biogen Idec (Nasdaq: BIIB), Monsanto (NYSE: MON), General Dynamics (NYSE: GD), and Whirlpool (NYSE: WHR). Learn more and get started Beyond that, you can take advantage of a free 30-day trial of our Rule Your Retirement newsletter service. It's prepared by Robert Brokamp, a smart and witty guy who distills what you really need to know into a manageable volume each month. A free trial will give you full access to all past issues, allowing you to gather valuable tips and even read how some folks have retired early and well. Robert regularly offers recommendations of promising stocks and mutual funds, too.
© 2007 Universal Press Syndicate. |
|
||||||
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts on themoneytimes.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. TheMoneyTimes advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision. ©2004-2007 All Rights Reserved unless mentioned otherwise. [Submit News/Press Release][Terms of Service] [Privacy Policy] [About us] [Contact us] |