Why You Shouldn't Sell

By Brian Richards and Tim Hanson

"You know less than you think you do."

That's a conclusion from behavioral economist James Montier. Whether you know it or not, he's saying, you're making big mistakes with your money. And that over time, they will cost you.

Dearly.

Stock madness
Think we're exaggerating? Consider this: Performance-chasing in mutual funds has gotten so bad that Morningstar has created an "investor returns" category to account for the problem of investors buying funds when they're hot, then selling when they're not. The difference between fund returns and investor returns can be startling -- as much as 20 percentage points.

Abby Normal?
Even if you're not into funds, your emotions are costing you money. Ever heard of "loss aversion"? It's the practice of holding onto losers in the hopes that they'll turn.

In another study, Professor Terrance Odean found that while investors held losing stocks for a median of 124 days, they held winning stocks for just 102 days. Moreover, investors were 1.7 times as likely to sell their winner.

In other words, investors are cutting winners off early and letting losers ride. That's the antithesis of a successful investment formula.

Alas, this madness can be explained. As master fund manager Ron Muhlenkamp puts it, "For most people 'The Game of the Stock Market' is a distraction which prevents them from making money in 'The Business of Investing.'"

That's why you only hear your buddies talk about their winners at cocktail parties. In the "The Game of the Stock Market," losers don't exist. But in "The Business of Investing," they're the reason why those same buddies haven't yet retired.

Small consolation: The pros aren't immune
Professional investors suffer from loss aversion, too, according to research from Andrea Frazzini. Pros were 1.2 times as likely to sell a winning stock rather than a losing stock. While not quite as bad as the 1.7 of the average Joe, these guys and gals supposedly earn their paychecks staying calm, cool, and collected!

So what's the solution? Easy. Simply enroll in one of those color-coded day-trading workshops coming soon to an airport Sheraton near you.

Nah, just kidding. The actual solution is so simple that you won't believe it when we tell you. So we're not going to tell you -- at least, not yet.

Let's lead with an example
In July 2002, 304 stocks rose more than 15%. Since then, 137 of them have continued to beat the market. A whopping 94, however, including Schmitt Industries (Nasdaq: SMIT), eCom Ventures (Nasdaq: ECMV), Rambus (Nasdaq: RMBS), and Interactive Intelligence (Nasdaq: ININ) have more than tripled. And 22, including Imperial Sugar (Nasdaq: IPSU), SBA Communications (Nasdaq: SBAC), and Central European Media (Nasdaq: CETV) are up an additional 1,000% or more.

You'd sure be kicking yourself today if you'd sold one of those to preserve a 15% gain.

The lesson? Quick trigger fingers aren't rewarded. While any stock may give back gains, the big bucks are made by finding winners like Imperial Sugar or Central European Media early on and letting them ride.

Be brash. Be boring.
So what's the solution? Buy to hold. Of course, be sure to hold the types of stocks that can be bought to hold. Stocks that are:

Stocks that meet those criteria can take many shapes, and Fool co-founders David and Tom Gardner endeavor to find them for our Motley Fool Stock Advisor subscribers. Since inception in 2002, their Stock Advisor picks are up 73% on average, versus 36% for the S&P 500. If you'd like to see David and Tom's top picks for new money now, click here to join Stock Advisor free for 30 days. There's no obligation to subscribe.