|
|
||||
![]() |
Thursday Sep 20
|
|||
| |
||||
Prepare to Un-Retireby Selena Maranjian - July 19, 2007 - 0 comments
not turning out to be like our parents' 60s."/> If you're imagining that once you wave goodbye to your pointy-headed boss and head off into the sunset, you'll live out the rest of your life in blissful retirement, think again. That's not how it's working for many people. It turns out that many people are returning to the workforce after retiring -- some by choice, some not. Heck, even a 67-year-old woman in Spain recently gave birth to twins. Our 60s are not turning out to be like our parents' 60s. Un-retiring, by choice First she caught up with all those little chores she'd been meaning to do. That consumed two or three months. Then she sat. And fidgeted. And got bored. And as to the cash flow from sitting, there wasn't much. Weaver not only enjoys selling and meeting new people, she also likes the constant learning so necessary in today's competitive world. So, at age 80, she began pursuing a real estate license and preparing for a new career. She's not alone. There are more older workers toiling away now than ever (more than twice as many as in 1984), with the Bureau of Labor Statistics noting that 36% of those 56 or older are still working. That's the highest level recorded since 1972. Relatively low unemployment rates are one factor driving this trend -- the jobs are out there. Un-retiring, not by choice Imagine that you're 50 and have saved $200,000 for your retirement. That might make you feel pretty smug -- and it is much more than many people have saved. But let's look more closely. If you're planning to retire in 15 years, at age 65, and you expect your money to grow at an average annual rate of 12% (which is ambitious, as the stock market's average annual growth rate is closer to 10%), then you'll end up with $1.1 million. In our Rule Your Retirement service, I learned that to make your nest egg last, you should conservatively plan to withdraw about 4% of it per year in retirement. So, 4% of $1,100,000 is nearly $44,000, or roughly $3,650 per month. Will that be enough? For many people, the answer is a resounding "yes." For many others, it's "No, not at all." Meanwhile, remember that most people aren't at $200,000 by age 50. According to the folks at the Employee Benefit Research Institute, more than half of workers 45 to 54 have saved less than $50,000 for retirement. If you're 50 and your $50,000 earns the market average of 10% over the coming 20 years (let's say you retire at 70), it will become just $336,375, enough to provide you with just $13,000 or so in annual income, if you're withdrawing 4%. On the bright side ... Also, don't go through all of this thinking and planning alone. Seek some help. For retirement guidance, I refer most often to Robert Brokamp's Rule Your Retirement service. You can, and should, try it for free for a whole month. Doing so will give you access to all of the past issues, which feature a host of "Success Stories" profiling people who retired early and are willing to share their strategies. It'll cost you nothing, there's no obligation to subscribe, and I'm pretty sure you'll like what you see. (Did I mention his frequent stock and fund recommendations?) And here's to un-retiring by choice, not by force! |
|
||||||
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts on themoneytimes.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. TheMoneyTimes advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision. ©2004-2007 All Rights Reserved unless mentioned otherwise. [Submit News/Press Release][Terms of Service] [Privacy Policy] [About us] [Contact us] |