The conventional wisdom is clear: Bonds are best for people in or near retirement. They provide the desired income and can be much more reliable than stocks. Well... yes and no, if you ask me.
Bonds do have some advantages. Those issued by the U.S. government offer income that's rather dependable. Even corporate bonds can be fairly reliable. That's a big deal, but beyond that, I'm having trouble coming up with other advantages. Oh, here's one more -- bonds can offer some diversification to your portfolio, as they don't always move in step with the stock market.
Stocks, though, have many advantages:
|
Company |
CAPS Stars (out of 5) |
Recent Yield |
5-Year Dividend Growth Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BP (NYSE: BP) |
***** |
5.8% |
14% |
|
PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP) |
***** |
3.0% |
17% |
|
Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) |
***** |
3.1% |
12% |
|
Kraft Foods (NYSE: KFT) |
**** |
4.3% |
9% |
|
Valero Energy (NYSE: VLO) |
***** |
3.1% |
37% |
|
Norfolk Southern |
**** |
3.0% |
32% |
|
Nokia (NYSE: NOK) |
**** |
4.0% |
17% |
Source: Motley Fool CAPS.
So do give dividend-paying companies serious consideration for your portfolio. Perhaps combine them with bonds as you near and enter retirement. Remember that many dividends are darn reliable -- plenty of companies have been paying them for more than 100 years.
© 2009 UCLICK, L.L.C.