London -- British scientists say a hair-sampling technique used to catch rapists will work better than a urine test to nab athletes using banned drugs.
Hair samples offer a "telltale history" of a person's consumption patterns for up to a year, the scientists say. On the other hand, urine testing detects illegal substances between two and five days after they have been ingested.
The test can also be carried out on body hair, so athletes with bald or wet-shaved heads would also expect to be caught, the Times of London said.
However, the World Anti-Doping Agency, whose rules govern international sports, including the Olympics, says nothing overrides the findings from urine or blood, as far as it's concerned.
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts on themoneytimes.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. TheMoneyTimes advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision.
Recent comments
15 hours 11 min ago
22 hours 48 sec ago
22 hours 2 min ago
1 day 43 min ago
1 day 1 hour ago
1 day 18 hours ago
2 days 8 hours ago
3 days 16 hours ago
1 week 9 hours ago
1 week 13 hours ago