Skip navigation.
Mon Mar 22 08:22:15 2010 [Write for us] | [Login/Register]
Home

Submitted by MT Bureau on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 12:53 ::

Salt Lake City -- Utah storefront lenders are refusing to make loans to military members rather than give them low rates mandated by a new law, an industry association said.

The new federal law, which took effect Monday, caps the yearly interest on "payday loans," car-title loans and tax-refund-anticipation loans at 36 percent for members of the military and their families.

Utah payday-loan interest rates generally average 521 percent and car title loans average 300 percent, the Salt Lake City Deseret Morning News reported.

Utah payday lenders simply cannot make a profit if they charge only 36 percent, so they would rather not do business with members of the military, payday loan industry spokesman Cort Walker told the newspaper.

While refusing loans to someone based on such things as race or religion would violate civil rights laws, refusing service to the military does not violate laws because "you can't force a business to enter into a transaction that causes it to lose money," said Walker, whose Utah Consumer Lending Association trade group represents Utah short-term lending stores.

Utah Division of Financial Institutions Supervisor Jerry Jaramillo said the state would review the new law's ramifications.

He said it also would watch for complaints and any court decisions about refusing loans to the military.

The Defense Department called payday lending practices "predatory."

© Copyright United Press International.

Refusing Military Loans

Need to wake up! The military regulations have “redefined” how the APR gets calculated, inflating it even more… while the rest of the nation is under a different set of rules. Huh? Anyway, google around on this move by DOD. Payday lenders are now refusing to offer their products to servicemen and woman as your article indicates. Many Refund Anticipation Loan Lenders are set to do the same thing this coming tax year. This is not a boycott against service people who need these products. Rather it is a result of the distortion of the products that many of the consumer advocates are getting away with. And while they win… people who “need” these products lose. Its a shame we legislate according to the minority squeeky wheel who have no idea the real circumstance many lower paid Americans face. Robbing them of “choice” is not responsible reform.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Recent comments

User login

Latest Classified Ad