Those efforts directly led to the capture of the Sasser worm creator."
Firstly, it's $500/vulnerability
Secondly, you fail to understand the difference between Mozilla and Microsoft. One is a non-profit organization that releases free, open-source programs while the other is a profit-driven enterprise that sells Operating Systems.
Thirdly, while Firefox can and probably will be patched up because anyone with access to the source can work on it, IE has a larger number of flaws which can only be corrected by the small group assigned to work on it at Microsoft
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts on themoneytimes.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. TheMoneyTimes advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision.
Re: Huh?
"The $500 reward is hilarious.
I don't remember Microsoft seeing an exploit shown and responding "we can't figure this out, can you give us a hint for $500?"
Can't wait to send this to my friend who thinks Firefox is 100% safe and bug-free.
By the way, Microsoft puts up $5,000,000 in rewards to catch hacker-criminals.
http://www.microsoft.com/security/antivirus/default.mspx
Those efforts directly led to the capture of the Sasser worm creator."
Firstly, it's $500/vulnerability
Secondly, you fail to understand the difference between Mozilla and Microsoft. One is a non-profit organization that releases free, open-source programs while the other is a profit-driven enterprise that sells Operating Systems.
Thirdly, while Firefox can and probably will be patched up because anyone with access to the source can work on it, IE has a larger number of flaws which can only be corrected by the small group assigned to work on it at Microsoft