Merck (NYSE: MRK) finally came clean on what the FDA wants before the drug formally known as Cordaptive (MK-0524A) can be approved. From the looks of it, it's going to be a long wait for Merck.
The Food and Drug Administration rejected MK-0524A back in April, but Merck didn't give much other information -- except that the FDA had rejected the brand name, too. On Friday, Merck elaborated that the FDA wants to see the results of a trial (HPS2-THRIVE) that won't be available until January 2013. That's a serious wait to turn around Merck's cholesterol franchise, which was hurt earlier this year when it and Schering-Plough (NYSE: SGP) presented results suggesting that Vytorin doesn't lower plaque in arteries any more than a generic statin.
Ironically, it was likely the Vytorin trial is what spurred the FDA to wait for the results of HPS2-THRIVE. Because Vytorin was approved based on a surrogate endpoint -- lowering bad cholesterol -- but hasn't been proven to save lives, the FDA now appears reluctant to approve MK-0524A based on its ability to raise good cholesterol and instead would like to see the results of HPS2-THRIVE, which will measure MK-0524A's ability to delay a major vascular event, such as a heart attack or a stroke. The shift away from using surrogate endpoints for cholesterol drugs is also delaying Isis Pharmaceuticals ' (Nasdaq: ISIS) and Genzyme 's (Nasdaq: GENZ) mipomersen drug from being approved for use in the general population.
It's a little surprising that the FDA would require Merck to wait for an outcomes study, because MK-0524A is a combination of extended-release niacin and laropiprant, and niacin is already approved as a treatment for cholesterol issues. The laropiprant part is a flushing inhibitor that reduces a hot-flash-like side effect of niacin. It's possible that the FDA is worried about the safety of the relatively new laropiprant, but it shouldn't take a trial of 20,000 subjects to detect any safety issues.
Merck has already received a positive recommendation for MK-0524A in Europe, so the drug should hit the market there by the end of the year, I would guess. That's some solace, but Merck's comeback in the cholesterol drug space in the U.S. is going to have to wait a few years.
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts on themoneytimes.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. TheMoneyTimes advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision.
Recent comments
5 hours 53 min ago
5 hours 55 min ago
2 days 17 hours ago
2 days 17 hours ago
2 days 18 hours ago
2 days 20 hours ago
3 days 17 hours ago
4 days 13 min ago
4 days 15 min ago
4 days 2 hours ago