The Next Black Monday

Three of the five best days the Dow Jones Industrial Average has ever experienced occurred in one 10-day stretch in 1987: Oct. 20 (up 5.88%), Oct. 21 (up 10.15%), and Oct. 29 (up 4.96%).

But that was not a great week for investors. It came in the wake of Black Monday -- Oct. 19, 1987, the single worst day in the Dow's history -- when, by 4 p.m. ET, the market became $500 billion less valuable. The Dow dropped 22.61% that day and followed it up a week later with an 8% drop -- the second-largest single-day drop in history.

When the dust settled, the very bluest of blue chips had taken a bath. General Motors (NYSE: GM), United Technologies (NYSE: UTX), and Honeywell (NYSE: HON) each lost 20% or more of their value in October 1987.

We bring this up because the investing landscape that preceded the current "correction" was strikingly reminiscent of those days. The term bubble was omnipresent. Corrections were predicted, followed by opposing bullish predictions driven by fundamentals.

Now recession is the word du jour. And stocks? Well, depending on your source, it's either the greatest time to buy or the greatest time to sell that anyone can remember.

Bring on Black Monday?
So, what's it all mean? Full disclosure: We're not sure it's possible to make much sense out of conflicting short-term signals.

But whether next Monday will be another "black" trading day or one of the best in history, there are only three things that matter when it comes to investing successfully:

For those reasons, patient long-term investors should be eagerly awaiting the next Black Monday even more so than the next Google or whatever comes along.

Say what?
Let's face facts: There will be but a handful of the next great growth stocks, and the odds of picking one are ... not good. But when the next Black Monday truly hits, hundreds of quality companies will suddenly become available at prices that virtually ensure success for long-term-minded investors.

That's what history has taught us. As Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel wrote, there is one reason Standard Oil was a better investment than IBM, despite IBM's superior growth: "valuation, the price you pay for the earnings and dividends you receive."

The most expensive book ever written
The Internet bubble was another painful reminder of that lesson. Our research showed that if you took a stake in every stock highlighted in Greg Kyle's 100 Best Internet Stocks to Own when it was published in the spring of 2000, and you held those stakes through October 2007, you'd have lost 62% of your capital.

For a book that cost about $15, that hurts. While Amazon.com , eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY), and 11 other companies simply earned a positive return, 18 names went entirely bankrupt.

The culprits? Quality and valuation. Many of these were poorly run and profitless companies that were nonetheless selling at stratospheric levels. Consider that even well-run technology companies such as Xilinx (Nasdaq: XLNX) and Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) disappointed shareholders because they were simply priced too aggressively. (Neither Xilinx nor Qualcomm was included in Kyle's book.)

And that's the irony of the chase: You're far more likely to find the next big bust than the next big thing.

But that was eight years ago, at the height of the "tech bubble." It's got nothing to do with today. Right?

Right?!
Look at a long-term chart, and you'll see that the Dow and S&P 500 are near all-time highs, despite the recent market sell-off. Regardless of the market environment, remember, three things matter for a successful investment plan:

If you insist on buying quality companies at good prices for the long term, it's tough to overpay, even in a bubble.

Easy-peasy
We're not trying to make successful investing sound easy. It's not. But it is possible for anyone willing to devote some time, effort, and resources to building a brighter financial future.

At Motley Fool Stock Advisor, Fool co-founders David and Tom Gardner have a stellar track record of recommending quality businesses at good prices. Their stock recommendations are beating the market by more than 43 percentage points on average since 2002.

Copyright © 2008 Universal Press Syndicate.