Are You Paying Your Pro the Wrong Way?

When you're hiring a financial planner, it pays to screen carefully. For one thing, you need to understand exactly how planner candidates are paid, so that you can make an informed market decision. But remember -- not many worthwhile pros work for peanuts. You don't want to get so ruthless about cost that you end up with worthless advice.

Commissions
There are essentially three types of commission payments:

Fee based on percentage of assets
As for fees, some planners charge a straight percentage of your total assets on an annual basis -- either all assets from your personal balance sheet, or just the assets they're helping you manage. This is the most common arrangement for paying an independent financial planner, and it's increasing in popularity.

Fee based on an hourly rate
Under this arrangement, you do the bulk of the work and pay the planner for information and advice on an as-needed basis -- like the typical arrangement with a personal lawyer.

Flat fee for a one-time financial plan
You pay a hefty up-front fee -- often many thousands of dollars -- for a glossy write-up of your total financial empire, complete with recommendations for action.

How compensation can taint the advice you get
You'll find that most planners mix and match these income options, with the end result -- surprise! -- that it's difficult to do a side-by-side comparison of financial pros. Don't be misled by simple labels. Ask planner candidates exactly how they will be paid. "Fee-only" should mean that the planner accepts no sales or trading commissions. Ask directly to be sure.

"Fee-based" and "fee-offset" are not the same as "fee-only." The fundamental basis of these relationships is a fee, but subsequent commissions are also part of the package -- either charged on top of fees ("fee-based") or subtracted from fees ("fee-offset").

In the best case, even a well-intentioned commission-based planner might overlook the best option for you if he or she isn't trained and paid for selling it. In the absolute worst case, commission-only planners are thinly disguised salespeople with no interest at all in your finances -- beyond selling you the one product for which they are most highly compensated.

Unless you know exactly what you're after, stay away from the "complete financial plan for a few thousand dollars" option. The resulting plans are often long on flashy charts but short on specific advice to solve your unique problems. Moreover, there may be no ongoing advice to service your constantly evolving needs.

The more money you have, the easier it will be to find a fee-based financial planner, particularly one that charges a "percent of assets" fee. Having a lot of money doesn't necessarily mean your finances are more complex, but it does make it more likely that a planner can save (or make) you enough to more than offset the ongoing fee.

Folks with a net worth of less than $100,000 will have a much tougher time finding a fee-based planner. Moreover, if they're just looking for occasional advice, an annual, asset-based fee is usually an expensive proposition relative to the payback. An hourly charge usually makes more sense in this case. If this is your situation, expect to take a little more time and effort to find a good planner. You probably won't get one knocking on your door.

The bottom line
Whether you have $1,000, $10,000, or $10 million to your name, you need to understand how the people who give you advice are paid, because the answer really does determine the difference between good and bad counsel.

Copyright © 2008 Universal Press Syndicate.