New Yorkers to be Enmeshed in Ring of Steel

I suggest to anyone willing to give up their privacy for a little security to read 1984... Is this what we are to come to? Security is freedom....

Benjamin Franklin:
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security

Responsibility for actions includes the innocent truth.
Politicians and Law Enforcement with the help of victims advocate groups has lied to the public.
The reason victim’s advocates continue their style of activity is they are cashing in.
Encouraging the infliction of pain and suffering rather than peace is a destructive activity use by theses activist who are willing to give up your Constitutional Rights so they can get rich with a technology that is proven to fail.
Requiring the breakup of families is extending entitlements which can only fail everyone.
Our nations entitled have no room left for those that can not afford to buy justice.
Religions need to justify self importance.
In god we trust has been bent to include the death penalty where our justice system is driven by how much money can be made destroying humanity rather than building our world and its people up, by selling short our devotion to each other as human beings, and over selling war which continues to divide mankind.
See how children as young as 3 years old have been placed on the registry.
How citizens are held indefinitely after their sentence has been served.
See it now on You Tube at
http://www.youtube.com/sosunite
Anyone with the need to punish anyone for having had to continue life after experiencing pain needs to rethink their belief system. This not about weather the world is flat or round, it is about basic human rights (Please write to the getsmart@usdoj.gov and make sure you put OAG Docket No 121 in the subject box or they will not take your comments.

Should we be giving up privacy for security? Its hard to say. There is always a balance though. The more privacy we have, the more we isolate ourselves for criminals to take advantage of. The question we need to look at is, "Is the threat significant enough to warrant the reduction in privacy?" Since we are dealing with people, the answer is dependent on who you are talking to.
There is a second problem. How do we ensure that the data collected by these cameras is only used to keep us safe? Who controls that data and who watches the people who control the data? These days it is difficult to say who I trust less, public officials(including politicians) or criminals. I'm afraid it will be just as bad with or without the cameras. We just won't know what the officials are doing with the data till we get further down the road. That will determine if it was worth it.