|
|
||||
![]() |
Friday Sep 05
|
|||
| |
||||
Smokers might end up being HIV+by Jyoti Pal - September 23, 2006 - 1 comments
People who smoke tobacco are more likely to become HIV-infected than those who do not, results of a new study reveals. According to the new study, smoking increases the risk of acquiring HIV, the virus known to cause AIDS. Cigarette smoking, a leading cause of preventable deaths in the world brings about changes in the immune system of the body, thus, smoking in early HIV disease, may increase risk. Apart from the already known devastating health effects of smoking like heart attack, respiratory troubles, cancers of lung and mouth, smokers also run a high chance of becoming HIV positive. Smoking weakens the immune system of the body, thus making it harder to fight off HIV-related infections. Tobacco smoking increases the risk of chronic lung disease for HIV positive smokers. It also interferes with processing of medications by the liver. Published in the journal 'Sexually Transmitted Infections' the study looked up the link between smoking and HIV. Five out of six studies analyzed, showed smokers had a higher chance of acquiring the HIV virus. The smokers suffered 60 percent higher risk of getting infected. However, Nine out of ten other studies taken up in the review to assess the progression from HIV to AIDS, revealed no link with smoking. Dr Andrew Furber,lead researcher at the South East Sheffield Primary Care Trust said, “The studies identified in this systematic review indicate that while smoking might be independently associated with acquiring HIV infection, it does not appear to be related to progression to AIDS.” Issuing a word of caution, the British doctors said that the HIV must be added to the list of health problems smoking leads to. They also wanted that prevevtion strategies should also focus the risk of HIV. |
|
||||||
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts on themoneytimes.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. TheMoneyTimes advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision. ©2004-2008 All Rights Reserved unless mentioned otherwise. [Submit News/Press Release][Terms of Service] [Privacy Policy] [About us] [Contact us] |
1 - Did the researchers control for cigarette smoking among specific populations ? One group of people may have higher rates of smoking AND higher rates of HIV infection [already, 'by default', and independent of smoking]. This may be more of a correlation to explore but not necessarily anything decisively causative in nature.
2 - Were individual differences - even within specific populations - takin into account?
For instance, were certain individuals (regardless of whatever subsection of society to which they may belong) more prone to smoking and higher risk activities.
Could there be a personality profile of any kind of 'risk-taking' personality that may explain the observed differences (other than one which is mainly biochemical) ?
3 - Given that progression from HIV to AIDS was not associated with cigarette smoking may suggest a re-examination of the biochemical explanation ?
[that is, if smoking is causing bad stuff to happen to peoples' bodies (stuff which leads them to be at greater risk for HIV infection) then would not that same bad-biochemistry-induced stuff not also allow for a higher rate of progression from HIV infection to AIDS.]
4 - This type of 'research' seems to further demonize people who smoke cigarettes AND those who have unwillingly contracted the blood-borne HIV pathogen.